Last updated: 16 August 2026
In short: We verify numbers against official notices, written fee quotes, on-record faculty association and named result datasets. If we cannot verify a selection figure, we say so or omit it. Banners are not proof.
What this page covers
This is the verification overview. Detailed rules live on child pages so a fee dispute and a result dispute are not mixed into one vague checklist.
- What counts as verified results — named exam, year and dataset.
- How fees are verified — prospectus, GST invoice, written quote.
- How faculty information is verified — on-record association versus a pamphlet photo.
- How student reviews are handled — emails and Google comments are not a paid star score.
What we try to verify on every comparison
- Exam dates and eligibility from official notifications.
- Fees and what is included, for the named batch and city.
- Whether a named teacher is on-record as associated with that centre.
- The geographic address of centres named in a review.
- Outcome claims that the institute puts in ads or on its site.
What we do not treat as proof
Anonymous WhatsApp forwards, undated screenshots, “100% selection” banners without a dataset, and paid testimonials presented as independent ranks.
When verification fails
We omit the number, mark it as unverified, or drop the institute from a tight comparison. Later evidence follows the Correction Policy.
Investigations: How We Investigate Information. Ranking method: How we rank coaching institutes.
Related: How we rank coaching institutes · How institutes are selected · How data is collected · What cannot influence rankings.
