This will be in tabular form (for clarity and CLAT exam relevance) with case name, year, and simplified explanation. These cases are the most important constitutional & legal precedents relevant for CLAT, Judiciary, and law exams.
Also Read – Best CLAT Coaching in India
100 Supreme Court Landmark Judgements for CLAT (List)
S. No. | Case Name & Year | Legal Principle / Explanation |
---|---|---|
1 | Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) | Established the Basic Structure Doctrine; Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution. |
2 | Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) | Expanded Article 21 (Right to Life) to include right to live with dignity and due process. |
3 | Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) | Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights. |
4 | Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) | Struck down election of PM; emphasized rule of law. |
5 | ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) | Held right to life can be suspended during Emergency (later overruled). |
6 | Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980) | Limited Parliament’s amending power; balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs. |
7 | Shankari Prasad v. Union of India (1951) | First case on constitutional amendment power; upheld Parliament’s power to amend. |
8 | Berubari Union Case (1960) | Presidential reference; clarified constitutional amendment under Article 368. |
9 | IC Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) | Held that Fundamental Rights are beyond Parliament’s amendment power. |
10 | SR Bommai v. Union of India (1994) | Limited misuse of President’s Rule under Article 356. |
11 | Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) | Declared Triple Talaq unconstitutional. |
12 | Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) | Laid down guidelines on sexual harassment at workplace (Vishaka Guidelines). |
13 | Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) | Decriminalized homosexuality; read down Section 377 IPC. |
14 | Indian Young Lawyers Assn. v. State of Kerala (2018) | Allowed entry of women in Sabarimala temple. |
15 | Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) | Struck down Adultery (Section 497 IPC) as unconstitutional. |
16 | Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) | Recognized Right to Privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21. |
17 | Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (1994) | First case explicitly recognizing the Right to Privacy. |
18 | M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1986) | Environmental protection; oleum gas leak case introduced absolute liability. |
19 | Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016) | Upheld criminal defamation. |
20 | Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011) | Allowed passive euthanasia under strict conditions. |
21 | Common Cause v. Union of India (2018) | Recognized Right to Die with dignity; allowed living wills. |
22 | Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (1979) | Recognized Right to free legal aid & speedy trial. |
23 | Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1978) | Expanded rights of prisoners. |
24 | Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (1984) | Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on bonded labour. |
25 | Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985) | Recognized Right to livelihood under Article 21. |
26 | Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993) | Recognized Right to Education under Article 21. |
27 | Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka (1992) | Right to education is a fundamental right. |
28 | T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002) | Rights of minorities to establish educational institutions. |
29 | P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra (2005) | Admission procedure for private professional colleges. |
30 | Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) | Upheld Mandal Commission reservations; introduced 27% OBC quota. |
31 | M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (2006) | Validated reservation in promotion with conditions. |
32 | Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008) | Upheld 27% OBC quota in central institutions. |
33 | Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018) | Clarified creamy layer in SC/ST promotions. |
34 | Daniel Latifi v. Union of India (2001) | Upheld Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act. |
35 | Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985) | Recognized divorced Muslim woman’s right to maintenance. |
36 | Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001) | Clarified Shah Bano; maintenance is for lifetime. |
37 | Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2013) | Disqualification of MPs/MLAs upon conviction. |
38 | Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006) | Upheld open ballot in Rajya Sabha elections. |
39 | Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (2002) | Candidate’s right to disclose assets and criminal record. |
40 | People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2003) | Introduced NOTA option in elections. |
41 | Shyam Narayan Chouksey v. Union of India (2018) | National anthem in cinema halls not mandatory. |
42 | State of West Bengal v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights (2010) | Upheld High Court’s power to order CBI investigation. |
43 | State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951) | First case striking down caste-based reservations. |
44 | Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1965) | Upheld Parliament’s amending power. |
45 | K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (Aadhaar Case, 2018) | Upheld Aadhaar but limited its use. |
46 | Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) | Struck down NJAC Act; upheld judicial primacy in appointments. |
47 | Second Judges Case (1993) | Introduced Collegium system of judicial appointments. |
48 | Third Judges Case (1998) | Expanded Collegium system. |
49 | First Judges Case (1981) | Held executive primacy in appointments (later overruled). |
50 | L Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) | Declared judicial review as part of basic structure. |
51 | Union Carbide v. Union of India (1989) | Bhopal Gas tragedy compensation. |
52 | Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India (2000) | Environmental clearance for dam project. |
53 | Samatha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1997) | Protection of tribal land. |
54 | Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin (1980) | Debt recovery cannot lead to imprisonment if debtor is poor. |
55 | Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006) | Police reforms guidelines. |
56 | Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995) | Bigamy under personal law; push for Uniform Civil Code. |
57 | Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) | Struck down Section 66A IT Act (freedom of speech online). |
58 | Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) | Internet access linked to freedom of speech. |
59 | Internet and Mobile Association v. RBI (2020) | Lifted ban on cryptocurrency trade. |
60 | Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Delhi (1981) | Right to live with dignity. |
61 | Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006) | Dissolution of Bihar assembly unconstitutional. |
62 | S.R. Chaudhuri v. Union of India (2001) | Restrictions on non-legislators becoming ministers. |
63 | J.P. Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993) | Clarified right to education scope. |
64 | PUCL v. Union of India (2003) | Voter’s right to know candidate details. |
65 | Union of India v. Rajendra Shah (2021) | Struck down parts of Tribunal Reforms Ordinance. |
66 | Kesavananda Revisited (2015) | Reaffirmed basic structure doctrine. |
67 | Shiv Sena v. Union of India (2019) | Floor test in Maharashtra assembly. |
68 | Ayodhya Case (2019) | Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute; temple trust established. |
69 | Rafale Deal Case (2019) | Cleared Rafale deal procurement. |
70 | Puttaswamy II (2019) | Data protection, Aadhaar reaffirmed. |
71 | State of Karnataka v. Union of India (1977) | Federalism case. |
72 | Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mills (2003) | Environment vs development. |
73 | Githa Hariharan v. RBI (1999) | Mothers as natural guardians. |
74 | John Vallamattom v. Union of India (2003) | Struck down discriminatory provisions against Christians. |
75 | Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker, Arunachal Pradesh (2016) | Speaker’s powers. |
76 | Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar (2017) | Limits of Ordinance-making power. |
77 | Aruna Roy v. Union of India (2002) | Value-based education case. |
78 | Namit Sharma v. Union of India (2013) | RTI and Information Commissions. |
79 | R.K. Garg v. Union of India (1981) | Economic legislation validity. |
80 | State of West Bengal v. Union of India (1962) | Distribution of powers, federalism. |
81 | LIC v. Consumer Education (1995) | Consumer rights. |
82 | MC Mehta v. Union of India (Taj Trapezium Case, 1997) | Pollution control near Taj Mahal. |
83 | MC Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997) | Public trust doctrine. |
84 | Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996) | Sustainable development principle. |
85 | Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India (1996) | Polluter pays principle. |
86 | PUDR v. Union of India (1982) | Right against exploitation, minimum wages. |
87 | Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab (1994) | Upheld TADA Act with safeguards. |
88 | DK Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) | Arrest guidelines to prevent custodial torture. |
89 | Vineet Narain v. Union of India (1998) | Independence of CBI. |
90 | Pramati Educational Trust v. Union of India (2014) | RTE Act validity. |
91 | Shabnam v. Union of India (2015) | Mercy petition scope. |
92 | Yakub Memon Case (2015) | Execution of death penalty upheld. |
93 | Union of India v. V. Sriharan (2015) | Life imprisonment for remainder of life. |
94 | Rajbala v. State of Haryana (2015) | Panchayat election qualifications. |
95 | Rajendra Singh v. State of MP (1996) | Compensation in criminal law. |
96 | Jagmohan Singh v. State of UP (1973) | Death penalty constitutional. |
97 | Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) | Laid down “rarest of rare” principle for death penalty. |
98 | Mithu v. State of Punjab (1983) | Struck down mandatory death penalty. |
99 | Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983) | Expanded “rarest of rare” doctrine. |
100 | Vikram Singh v. Union of India (2015) | Death penalty proportionality upheld. |
This covers 100 landmark SC judgments in a concise tabular form with explanations.
Also Read – Best CLAT Coaching in India
With a fervent love for literature and an upbringing in the disciplined environment of the army, he embodies a unique blend of passion and discipline. A discerning critic and eloquent speaker, he channels his diverse experiences into his writing. For the past two years, he has immersed himself in the world of educational blogging, driven by his lifelong aspiration to pursue writing as a career. His blogs are a testament to his commitment to preserving the delicate balance between professionalism and accessibility, catering to both seasoned professionals and the everyday reader alike