For students aspiring to a career in law, the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) and the All India Law Entrance Test (AILET) represent two of the most significant gateways to premier legal education in India. While both are highly competitive national-level examinations, they possess fundamental differences that can influence a candidate’s choice. Deciding which exam is “better” depends entirely on an aspirant’s goals, strengths, and target institutions.
Conducting Bodies and Participating Institutes
The most significant distinction between the two exams lies in the scope of admissions they offer. CLAT is conducted by the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) for admission into 24 of the country’s NLUs, excluding NLU Delhi. Moreover, its scores are accepted by numerous other private law colleges and universities, offering a wide array of options to successful candidates.
Conversely, AILET is conducted exclusively by National Law University, Delhi (NLU Delhi) for admission to its undergraduate (BA LLB Hons.) and postgraduate (LLM) programs. NLU Delhi is consistently ranked as one of the top law schools in India, making AILET a highly sought-after but narrowly focused examination. Your choice primarily hinges on whether your dream is to enter the prestigious NLU Delhi or to have a broader range of top-tier NLUs to choose from.
Examination Pattern and Structure
Although both exams test similar aptitudes, their patterns exhibit key differences that demand distinct preparation strategies.
CLAT Exam Pattern
The CLAT UG exam consists of 120 multiple-choice questions to be answered in 120 minutes. It is a comprehension-based test, with questions following passages across five sections. A correct answer fetches one mark, while an incorrect response incurs a penalty of 0.25 marks. The sections include:
- English Language
- Current Affairs, including General Knowledge
- Legal Reasoning
- Logical Reasoning
- Quantitative Techniques
Also Read :Best CLAT Coaching Institutes in India
AILET Exam Pattern
The AILET exam features 150 multiple-choice questions, but the duration was recently increased to 120 minutes, aligning it with CLAT’s timeframe. It also follows the same marking scheme of +1 for a correct answer and -0.25 for a wrong one. However, its sectional composition differs notably. The AILET UG paper is divided into three sections:
- English Language
- Current Affairs & General Knowledge
- Logical Reasoning
The most prominent difference is the absence of dedicated Legal Reasoning and Quantitative Techniques sections in AILET, with a significantly higher weightage given to Logical Reasoning.
Syllabus and Question Style
The syllabus for both exams overlaps considerably, especially in English, Current Affairs, and Logical Reasoning, allowing for integrated preparation. However, the style of questioning can vary. CLAT has transitioned to a format where all questions, including those in the Current Affairs and Quantitative Techniques sections, are preceded by a comprehensive passage. This tests a candidate’s ability to read, comprehend, and analyze information quickly.
AILET, on the other hand, often features more direct, one-liner questions, particularly in its General Knowledge section. The Logical Reasoning section in AILET is extensive and can include a broader range of puzzle-based and analytical questions compared to CLAT. The absence of a Quantitative Techniques section makes AILET an attractive option for students who are less comfortable with mathematics.
Also Read : Best CLAT Coaching in Delhi
Difficulty Level and Competition
Deciding which exam is tougher is subjective and depends on a student’s strengths. Statistically, AILET is often considered more competitive. While CLAT attracts a larger number of applicants, it also offers access to over 3,000 undergraduate seats across the participating NLUs.
In contrast, AILET has a much smaller intake, with approximately 110-120 seats available at NLU Delhi. This drastically increases the competition, making the seat-to-applicant ratio much steeper. In terms of question paper difficulty, both exams are demanding, but AILET has historically been perceived as having a slightly more challenging and unpredictable Logical Reasoning section. Ultimately, the best strategy for a serious law aspirant is often to prepare for and attempt both examinations to maximize their opportunities for admission into a top-tier law university.
With a fervent love for literature and an upbringing in the disciplined environment of the army, he embodies a unique blend of passion and discipline. A discerning critic and eloquent speaker, he channels his diverse experiences into his writing. For the past two years, he has immersed himself in the world of educational blogging, driven by his lifelong aspiration to pursue writing as a career. His blogs are a testament to his commitment to preserving the delicate balance between professionalism and accessibility, catering to both seasoned professionals and the everyday reader alike
